AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Coworker vaping inside the office8/3/2023 In addition, opponents claim that although smoking is more physically harmful than vaping, the latter is still unhealthy. Also, "some workers find vaping unsettling and disruptive, based simply on how vaping looks," according to AllOneHealth (a Pennsylvania-based consulting company). The first is that while it's not as offensive as cigarette smoke, smells emanating from vaping devices waft around the workplace and are unpleasant to many non-vapers. Vaping-in-the-workplace opponents offer a few primary arguments. If vapers who gave up smoking cigarettes are required to congregate with smokers outside when they vape, some may backslide and resume smoking.If employees can consume such products as nicotine-laced chewing gum at work, they should also be allowed to vape.Vaping helps people wean themselves from the more harmful habit of smoking cigarettes.It can help boost vapers' concentration and productivity.Vaping isn't nearly as offensive to non-vapers (or shouldn't be) as cigarette smoke, therefore vapers' personal freedom shouldn't be restricted by a vaping ban.What Supporters SayĪssuming you still have some discretion in the matter, here are the principal arguments made by proponents of vaping in the workplace. Many other states have less sweeping anti-vaping laws, such as banning it only in restaurants, bars and hotels. In some states (including California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Vermont) along with dozens of municipalities, the issue has been settled by state legislatures and city councils, which have banned the practice.Įven one San Francisco-based vaping products maker was recently forced to prohibit its employees from using the company's own product at work. Several large employers, including Wal-Mart, Target, Starbucks, UPS and CVS, have banned in-house vaping.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |